> Uhm, doesn't this break the ABI? I e, the exported symbol
> "pa_channels_valid" will no longer exist in libpulse.so, causing
> existing apps to crash, unless they recompile against the new headers?
right; should add a PA_CHANNELS_VALID() to sample-util.h instead
thanks, p.
> On 2014-11-05 00:26, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net>
> > ---
> > src/pulse/sample.c | 4 ----
> > src/pulse/sample.h | 4 +++-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/pulse/sample.c b/src/pulse/sample.c
> > index 0d81a32..52ded48 100644
> > --- a/src/pulse/sample.c
> > +++ b/src/pulse/sample.c
> > @@ -111,10 +111,6 @@ int pa_sample_rate_valid(uint32_t rate) {
> > return rate > 0 && rate <= PA_RATE_MAX;
> > }
> >
> > -int pa_channels_valid(uint8_t channels) {
> > - return channels > 0 && channels <= PA_CHANNELS_MAX;
> > -}
> > -
> > int pa_sample_spec_valid(const pa_sample_spec *spec) {
> > pa_assert(spec);
> >
> > diff --git a/src/pulse/sample.h b/src/pulse/sample.h
> > index 86973d4..86f65b1 100644
> > --- a/src/pulse/sample.h
> > +++ b/src/pulse/sample.h
> > @@ -297,7 +297,9 @@ int pa_sample_rate_valid(uint32_t rate) PA_GCC_PURE;
> >
> > /** Return non-zero if the channel count is within the supported range.
> > * \since 5.0 */
> > -int pa_channels_valid(uint8_t channels) PA_GCC_PURE;
> > +static inline int pa_channels_valid(uint8_t channels) {
> > + return channels > 0 && channels <= PA_CHANNELS_MAX;
> > +}
> >
> > /** Return non-zero when the sample type specification is valid */
> > int pa_sample_spec_valid(const pa_sample_spec *spec) PA_GCC_PURE;
> >
>
>
--
Peter Meerwald
+43-664-2444418 (mobile)
