(Resend including list as well) On 17 Feb 2014 09:30, "Arun Raghavan" <arun at accosted.net> wrote: > On 16 February 2014 16:33, Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> > wrote: > [...] > > Yes, I can and I will start the implementation from the volume control > > objects, but let's not stop the discussion about volume classes / audio > > groups, because I will need to implement a client API for working with > > volume classes anyway. The sooner I know how to do it, the better. > > We have 3 orthogonal issues here: > > 1. Addition of volume control objects / information to allow balance > to be represented adequately > > 2. Creation and control of volume classes > > 3. Adding a "main volume" concept > > I suggest we discuss each in a separate thread to keep the discussion > manageable. Right now, I'll address the first, viz. volume control > objects. > > I'm not completely clear what you're trying to achieve with volume > control objects right now - are you just trying to fix the balance > problem, or ...? I see the point you're making about the potential > applicability of associating multiple volume controls with a single > device, but I'd like to understand what you'll be solving with the > patch set you'd be submitting with this infrastructure. > > Mainly, I ask this because I don't want to add infrastructure and > especially public API for features we don't have yet and don't seem to > have a clear path for either (namely controlling equalizer, AGC, and > other such parameters) > > Cheers, > Arun > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20140217/9f34a601/attachment.html>
