> > > > handle_srbchannel_memblock() should return when memblock sanity checks
> > > > fail
> > >
> > > Hmm, the reason I kept it on separate lines was for more specific error
> > > checking, i e, you could tell which of the checks that failed from looking
> > > in
> > > the debug log. IIRC, I'm not sure? But yeah, the early return makes sense.
> >
> > ah, ok; I'll add three returns then
> >
> > any objections to apply the series?
>
> No objections, go ahead.
pushed the series, thanks!
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net>
> > > > Cc: David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > src/pulse/context.c | 9 ++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/src/pulse/context.c b/src/pulse/context.c
> > > > index db89b58..b8ebced 100644
> > > > --- a/src/pulse/context.c
> > > > +++ b/src/pulse/context.c
> > > > @@ -350,12 +350,11 @@ static void handle_srbchannel_memblock(pa_context
> > > > *c,
> > > > pa_memblock *memblock) {
> > > > pa_assert(c);
> > > >
> > > > /* Memblock sanity check */
> > > > - if (!memblock)
> > > > - pa_context_fail(c, PA_ERR_PROTOCOL);
> > > > - else if (pa_memblock_is_read_only(memblock))
> > > > - pa_context_fail(c, PA_ERR_PROTOCOL);
> > > > - else if (pa_memblock_is_ours(memblock))
> > > > + if (!memblock || pa_memblock_is_read_only(memblock) ||
> > > > + pa_memblock_is_ours(memblock)) {
> > > > pa_context_fail(c, PA_ERR_PROTOCOL);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > /* Create the srbchannel */
> > > > c->srb_template.memblock = memblock;
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
--
Peter Meerwald
+43-664-2444418 (mobile)
