On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:29:37AM +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:51 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > 17.08.2014 12:38, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > > Patch review status updated: > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/PatchStatus/ > > > > ... > > > > > Resampler quality testing > > > > > > From: poljar (Damir Jeli?) > > > Submission date: 2013-08-26(?) > > > In a github branch: https://github.com/poljar/pulseaudio/commits/resampler_quality > > > > Review: does not answer the question "is this distortion audible?" and > > provides no way to evaluate quality of non-PulseAudio resamplers. > > > > So I have decided to redo all of this using a different approach. The > > new work is based on a psychoacoustical model in order to correct the > > first objection, and is supposed to judge any resampler according to its > > output as a wav file (including Windows output recorded by KVM) when > > given a linear sine sweep. I have already implemented the model, can > > answer the "is this distortion audible" question given the spectrum of > > the signal and the distortion, but have not used this yet to analyze the > > resampler output. Damir also provided useful contributions. So this is > > definitely no longer "Waiting for Review". > > > > As this successor is now a side project that does not share code with > > PulseAudio and does not even use PulseAudio, I don't expect it to > > produce a PulseAudio patch. If Damir agrees, let's remove it from the page. > > Ok, I'm waiting for "yes" or "no" from Damir. ACK.
