Am 20.10.2013 19:07, schrieb Paul LeoNerd Evans: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:23:50 +0200 > Thomas Martitz <kugel at rockbox.org> wrote: > >> I wonder if it's really in the tunnel module or somewhere deeper. > Well, in my setup there are two modules to consider - the tunnel and > the loopback, so I guess it could be in either. I can't easily think > how to distinguish. I have tried the reversed set up: I used (only) module-tunnel-sink in the machine that produces the sound. This sink sends the stream over immediately. The receiver just loads module-native-protocol-tcp (and module-zeroconf-publish). The latency behavior is the same as you describe, although I don't have run tcpdump for analysis yet. > I have a few ideas myself for things that could be improved. Primarily > would be a way to run a tunnel and have it push sound directly into a > local sink, rather than simply provide a new source. That way I could > avoid needing the loopback module. Yea, this is what I used above. I welcome you to retry it with this set up, perhaps I did something wrong. Although I think you cannot stream to multiple receivers without module-loopback this way either (correct me if I'm wrong). Best regards.
