'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 24/04/13 12:36 did gyre and gimble: > On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 00:12 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When playing with the git repo, I see it still contains some heads with >> the name "tags" e.g. refs/heads/tags/release-0.9.9 >> >> One tool I have here tries to interpret refs/heads/tags (probably badly) >> and bails. Now this code should be more self tolerant, but having >> recently done some git-svn conversions, I wonder if we shouldn't fix up >> the legacy tag branches anyway? >> >> e.g. if we run this code, it'll sort out the old "tags": >> >> >> git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' refs/heads/tags | cut -d / -f 4 | >> grep ^release- | sed 's/^release-//' | while read ref; do git tag >> "v$ref" "refs/heads/tags/release-$ref"; git branch -D >> "tags/release-$ref"; done >> >> Does this make sense? > > Sounds good to me. Forgot to say, but this was done as people would likely have seen if they had done a git pull. Hope all is well with it :) Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
