On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 23:37 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 2013/3/25 Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi>: > > That's better than nothing, but I don't think we should settle for a > > solution that interrupts ongoing audio. And I don't think "settings will > > not take effect until PulseAudio is restarted" is comprehensible by the > > main target demographic of Ubuntu. > > Let me debunk this. By the same logic, also incomprehensible is the > very fact that PulseAudio has settings other than those already > exposed by pavucontrol and/or gnome-golume-control. I don't see how this debunks my argument. Yes, I think normal users aren't aware of any of the configuration options that are available outside gnome-volume-control. > So yes, this is a > +1 to the real configuration system. I'm also for a real configuration system. -- Tanu
