On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 10:04 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > On 03/22/2013 08:39 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:10 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > >> If tlength is not specified and maxlength is, tlength should never > >> be set higher than maxlength by default. > > > > Shouldn't this be enforced even if tlength is specified? > > Or should instead maxlength be increased to fit the specified tlength? > It's a matter of taste. pa_memblockq adapts tlength to maxlength, so doing the same here would be more consistent with that. In any case, the patch doesn't ensure that tlength is always at most maxlength. -- Tanu
