On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > +int pa_bt_backend_register(pa_bluetooth_discovery *y, pa_bluetooth_backend *b, enum profile p, void *bp); > +void pa_bt_backend_unregister(pa_bluetooth_discovery *y, pa_bluetooth_backend *b, enum profile p); Could we use just one bluetooth prefix instead of two: "pa_bluetooth_" and "pa_bt_"? I'd prefer "pa_bluetooth_". -- Tanu