On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 14:39 +0000, Ian Malone wrote: > On 11 January 2013 13:37, Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/11/2013 02:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote: > >> > >> This fixes a bug where pulseaudio would give up the device (due to > >> a request from JACK), but then immediately grab it again because > >> the monitor callback fired, telling that the device is now available. > >> > >> (Note: the protocol does not specify a timeout, i e if pulseaudio > >> is requested to give its device up but JACK does not grab the dbus name, > >> at what point is PulseAudio allowed to re-grab it?) > >> > > Thank you! > > > > > Is this a fix for the bug that is mentioned in this thread? > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-November/015254.html > > > > Looks like it, I'll try to find some time to test at the weekend. As I mentioned in the other mail, this looks equivalent to the patch that I sent earlier. That patch didn't solve the bug where pulseaudio would own the bus name, but not implement the interface for requesting device release. -- Tanu
