On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:26 +0100, Peter Meerwald wrote: > idea is to allow optimized code path (similar to volume code) > and rework/specialize mixing cases to enable runtime performance improvements > > no functionality changes in this patch > > Signed-off-by: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net> > --- > src/Makefile.am | 2 + > src/modules/module-virtual-source.c | 1 + > src/pulsecore/mix.c | 679 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/pulsecore/mix.h | 59 +++ > src/pulsecore/sample-util.c | 644 --------------------------------- > src/pulsecore/sample-util.h | 28 -- > src/pulsecore/sink-input.c | 2 +- > src/pulsecore/sink.c | 1 + > src/pulsecore/sound-file-stream.c | 1 + > src/pulsecore/source-output.c | 2 +- > src/pulsecore/source.c | 2 +- > src/tests/mix-test.c | 1 + > 12 files changed, 747 insertions(+), 675 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 src/pulsecore/mix.c > create mode 100644 src/pulsecore/mix.h > > diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am > index 1208a35..d479194 100644 > --- a/src/Makefile.am > +++ b/src/Makefile.am > @@ -856,6 +856,8 @@ libpulsecore_ at PA_MAJORMINOR@_la_SOURCES = \ > pulsecore/remap_mmx.c pulsecore/remap_sse.c \ > pulsecore/resampler.c pulsecore/resampler.h \ > pulsecore/rtpoll.c pulsecore/rtpoll.h \ > + pulsecore/sample-util.c pulsecore/sample-util.h \ Why is sample-util added to libpulsecore? It's also in libpulsecommon, so it should already be available to libpulsecore. -- Tanu
