[PATCH] bluetooth: Use 'Alias' instead of 'Name'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jo?o Paulo,

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:48 PM,  <jprvita at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita at openbossa.org>
>
> According to the BlueZ API documentation the 'Alias' property should be
> preffered over the 'Name' property. Also, if the device doesn't have a
> remote name the 'Name' property may not be set, but the 'Alias' property
> will always be.

Can you point to the documentation you refer to? 'Alias' is a
user-modifiable property, while 'Name' is what the remote device
reports. They just have different purposes, so I don't think one of
them is preferred over the other as a general rule.

> ---
>  src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c          | 7 +------
>  src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h          | 1 -
>  src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c
> index c15ecd1..b0ee62c 100644
> --- a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c
> +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ static pa_bluetooth_device* device_new(pa_bluetooth_discovery *discovery, const
>
>      d->device_info_valid = 0;
>
> -    d->name = NULL;
>      d->path = pa_xstrdup(path);
>      d->paired = -1;
>      d->alias = NULL;
> @@ -228,7 +227,6 @@ static void device_free(pa_bluetooth_device *d) {
>          uuid_free(u);
>      }
>
> -    pa_xfree(d->name);
>      pa_xfree(d->path);
>      pa_xfree(d->alias);
>      pa_xfree(d->address);
> @@ -364,10 +362,7 @@ static int parse_device_property(pa_bluetooth_device *d, DBusMessageIter *i, boo
>              const char *value;
>              dbus_message_iter_get_basic(&variant_i, &value);
>
> -            if (pa_streq(key, "Name")) {
> -                pa_xfree(d->name);
> -                d->name = pa_xstrdup(value);
> -            } else if (pa_streq(key, "Alias")) {
> +            if (pa_streq(key, "Alias")) {
>                  pa_xfree(d->alias);
>                  d->alias = pa_xstrdup(value);
>              } else if (pa_streq(key, "Address")) {
> diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h
> index 3361b0f..1040d5b 100644
> --- a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h
> +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ struct pa_bluetooth_device {
>      int device_info_valid;      /* 0: no results yet; 1: good results; -1: bad results ... */
>
>      /* Device information */
> -    char *name;

I don't see the removal as part of this patch, regardless of what you
do with pa_proplist_sets() below.

>      char *path;
>      pa_bluetooth_transport *transports[PA_BLUETOOTH_PROFILE_COUNT];
>      int paired;
> diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c b/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c
> index cd0a515..ddf658f 100644
> --- a/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c
> +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-device.c
> @@ -2237,7 +2237,7 @@ static int add_card(struct userdata *u) {
>      data.driver = __FILE__;
>      data.module = u->module;
>
> -    n = pa_bluetooth_cleanup_name(device->name);
> +    n = pa_bluetooth_cleanup_name(device->alias);
>      pa_proplist_sets(data.proplist, PA_PROP_DEVICE_DESCRIPTION, n);
>      pa_xfree(n);
>      pa_proplist_sets(data.proplist, PA_PROP_DEVICE_STRING, device->address);
> @@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ static int add_card(struct userdata *u) {
>
>      pa_proplist_sets(data.proplist, "bluez.path", device->path);
>      pa_proplist_setf(data.proplist, "bluez.class", "0x%06x", (unsigned) device->class);
> -    pa_proplist_sets(data.proplist, "bluez.name", device->name);
> +    pa_proplist_sets(data.proplist, "bluez.name", device->alias);

What's the purpose of replacing this existing property instead of
adding 'bluez.alias'?

Btw, I'm not seeing any user of this property so I'm wondering why
you're interested in such a change. Is it for development and testing
purposes?

>      data.name = get_name("card", u->modargs, device->address, &b);
>      data.namereg_fail = b;
>
> --

Cheers,
Mikel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux