On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 08:03:25 AM Thomas Martitz wrote: > Am 31.03.2013 05:56, schrieb Alexander E. Patrakov: > > 2013/3/30 Justin Chudgar <justin at justinzane.com>: > >>> The "unwanted frequencies are discarded" part is what you did wrong. > >> > >> I disagree with this analysis for this use-case. If this implementation > >> were in remix.c it would make sense. However, it works with fictitious, > >> synthetic, duplicated, averaged, generally boooooooogus (can't find > >> quite the right adjective) source data. This module does NOT do > >> remixing. Though I would prefer this to be done in remix.c, many people > >> have said that it should be in a module and I am simply trying to > >> achieve what I want within the guidelines laid out by more experienced > >> and smarter pulseaudio community members.> > > OK. Since there are contradicting requirements put on you by different > > people, let there be two modules. One for your use case (discard high > > frequencies from the LFE channel, add phase delays to other channels > > accordingly), one for my use case (move bass to subwoofer from other > > channels). And yes, our use cases both matter, and they differ also by > > the selection of the source material. I was talking more with music > > DVDs and BluRays in mind, you had CDs. > > > > Still, I reserve the right to review the code. > > Just don't expect him to implement your use case :) Actually, for all the help he has given me, I'm going to give it a shot. Besides, assuming I understand him correctly, I think that it would be an excellent thing to eventually merge into remix.c replacing the simplistic averaging done now. > _______________________________________________ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
