On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 17:35 +0300, ismo.puustinen at intel.com wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patch review! Here are the revised patches. I agree that > the interface is quite limited for GUI use, and is mostly useful when > the plugins are known beforehand. However, to do complex LADSPA plugin > management, the GUI needs to dig quite deeply to the PulseAudio > internals -- think having multiple LADSPA plugins chained together. Well, there could be simpler GUIs than ones that handle full plugin chains. It would be great to even have a GUI that shows what LADSPA sinks are currently loaded and lets the user to tweak their parameters. > The > hypothetical GUI application might do the plugin introspection directly > from the plugin files like the "analyseplugin" command does. That might be a viable approach too. I hadn't thought about that. -- Tanu
