Transitioning from pa_bool_t to C99 bool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/7/2 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>:
> I don't think there is any reason to not do s/pa_bool_t/bool/g. Probably the
> reason for this might be historical, as some compilers may have supported
> some C99 features but not all of them (Microsoft compilers come to mind).

Does pulseaudio work on Windows? If it doesn't work at all, why should
we bother ;)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux