2012/1/28 Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi>: > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 10:01 +0800, Feng Wei wrote: >> Hi Colin, >> Sorry for not making the question clearly. >> In alsa module, we parsed out alsa mapping information from >> profile-sets and mixer paths, and create sink from mapping, so I >> thought there should be same for mapping priority and sink priority, >> while port priority comes from mixer path/setting priority. I found >> port priority assignment in source code, but alsa mapping priority is >> never used, sink priority is only dependent on PA_PROP_DEVICE_CLASS, >> PA_PROP_DEVICE_FORM_FACTOR, PA_PROP_DEVICE_BUS, >> PA_PROP_DEVICE_PROFILE_NAME. >> So if I can't specify the default sink by profile-sets config files. > > I didn't even know that sinks have priorities... But it appears that > yes, they do, and it's used when the default sink needs to figure out in > a situation where there's no sink currently set as default (and only at > that situation!). Absolutely it is. > > Using the mapping priority as the sink priority doesn't sound like a > good idea, because the same mapping configuration can be used with > multiple cards - it doesn't make much sense to set the priority to the > same value for among all stereo sinks and among all 5.1 sinks etc. What > is the actual problem you're trying to solve here? I just want something to be default sink out of the box before any default sink is specified. > Using the sink > priorities probably isn't the right solution, whatever the problem is. If there are other approaches, I agree. > > -- > Tanu > > _______________________________________________ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss -- Wei.Feng (irc wei_feng) Linaro Multimedia Team Linaro.org???Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow?Linaro:?Facebook?|?Twitter?|?Blog
