On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:15 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:41 +0300, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > > Huh? I clicked on reply-all (in gmail) on Guanqun's message and it put > > Colin in the CC. How is that possible? > > The same happens with Evolution. I'm now responding to your mail with > "Reply to All", and you're not in CC, only Colin is. So apparently if > Reply-to is set, then "Reply to All" doesn't add the sender to the CC > header. I guess the logic is that if the sender uses the Reply-to > header, he doesn't want any mail to the address in the From header. If someone wants to continue discussing whether some change is needed, I think these are required reading before doing so: "Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Reply-To Munging Considered Useful http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html "Reply-To" Munging Still Considered Harmful. Really. http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html I'll have to read them myself before saying what my opinion is. FWIW, the last time when I read them, in the context of some other list, my conclusion was against Reply-To munging, but I don't know if the situation is somehow different with pulseaudio-discuss. -- Tanu
