On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 21:52 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > I think you could still have separate ports for each accessory type. It > would make it simpler to set up accessory specific tuning parameters, > for example, if the only thing that mattered was the port in use, > instead of the port and some property. I meant to say also that from the UI point of view it shouldn't be any more complex: it can just mark the appropriate port as available (so it works as a jack detection mechanism of sorts). -- Tanu
