On 11/08/2011 06:52 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:09 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: >> On 11/03/2011 08:22 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> > I'd like ports to have their own subscription class. >> >> I also think that could be nice, and I looked into that, but as I >> understand it, it would require every port to be registered with the >> core (so it gets an index that is used when things change) and several >> API additions to make it useful. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "several API additions", but at least > registering port objects to the core would be something that I'd > actually like to see happen. Sure, and I'm not saying doing so would be wrong, but it would require changes to the core, the protocol, the client API, etc. It is not work I can sign up for at this time. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic
