On 2011-02-09 17:07, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > As I said before, the last commit > [72b90ea8ac53e23862284991a2ce355de250f585] is really beyond my > understanding of rewinds and would definately not be appropriate for > stable-queue without further review. Also, it has not been tested in > combination with David's rewind patches, so that needs to be done too. From what I can tell, the change seems to be copy-pasted from protocol-native.c, and so it's probably correct. My rewind patches shouldn't change that either for better or for worse. That said, of course testing wouldn't hurt :-) -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic
