[PATCH] Initialise write_volume callback

[tanuk@xxxxxx (Tanu Kaskinen)]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 15:13 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> How about just setting it to 0 when doing the return? Does that no avoid
> the need for the 2nd patch or does this just confuse the semantics of
> the whole thing?

I think setting *usec_to_next to 0 would be fine.

-- 
Tanu