I don't know the exact cause for someone to submit a bug report for
this error message: if someone is truly offended by it (if so it is
a reminder that some people are more sensitive than others, and I do
want those people to feel welcome as well), or if it's a system's
check (if this goes through, it shows the system works, and the person
might put more work into his/her next patch), or if it's just a bug
(after all, it's not that weird to run two instances of PulseAudio?).
Either one could be reason enough to apply IMO.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>
---
src/daemon/main.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/daemon/main.c b/src/daemon/main.c
index 55726fd..3cff85a 100644
--- a/src/daemon/main.c
+++ b/src/daemon/main.c
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static pa_dbus_connection *register_dbus_name(pa_core *c, DBusBusType bus, const
if (dbus_error_is_set(&error))
pa_log_error("Failed to acquire %s: %s: %s", name, error.name, error.message);
else
- pa_log_error("D-Bus name %s already taken. Weird shit!", name);
+ pa_log_error("D-Bus name %s already taken.", name);
/* PA cannot be started twice by the same user and hence we can
* ignore mostly the case that a name is already taken. */
--
1.7.5.4
