On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:19, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > Has qemu informed PA about required latency? There's an API for that. > That's a really hard piece of information to provide, in general at the VM-level, because various applications inside the VM may require different latency guarantees. That said, this makes me wonder if the idea of virtualizing a sound card isn't the right approach here, and instead, the pulse clients (be they native or via the alsa pulse plugin) should be contacting a pulseaudio server on the host? Would it be more feasible to manage latency this way? -- Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: -= jeremy at nickurak.ca =- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20100924/01e623fb/attachment.htm>
