Protecting system wide settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I really don't know where this comes in probably built in to the preamp of the sound chip I seem to remember amplifier designs that worked similarly if the microphone was 2 separate microphones there wouldnt be a problem its possible acer engineers decided to physically tie them together for the internal microphone. using an external microphone there isn't this issue. 

microphone levels don't really need to be set per application although they could be.  However who is in charge of my netbook me or google or skype or ekiga .  I should be in control and currently PulseAudio grants control to whoever fights hardest. 

 
Micha? Sawicz

john owen-jones pisze:
> any chance that the super user can set and lock the input levels?
 
Micha? Sawicz

Where do you think this phase reversion takes place? Maybe it would be
simply better to fix that, if possible? This really doesn't seem like
correct behavior.

_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20100904/085c5436/attachment.htm>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux