On 05/12/2010 03:48 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: > On 05/11/2010 11:29 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:21 +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: >> >>> Add-to-wishlist: ability to use codecs here would be nice. I doesn't >>> look like I can use ladspa plugins over the tunnel, or can I? If so, how? >>> 1.4Mbit/s is a little high when most modern cpus can compress audio to >>> 192Kbit/s on the fly without consuming any significant amount of CPU. >>> >> The lack of compression is a known bug :) AFAIK nobody is currently >> working on the feature, though. >> > That's a shame. > Especially since it consumes the whole bandwidth allocation whether > actual sound is being played or not! Ouch. > Well, at least when using an ssh tunnel with CompressionLevel=9 you > can reduce that down to around 220Kbit/s when idle. (from 1.4Mbit/s) I > haven't tried with single-channel 22KHz yet. Correction, that's ~56Kbit/s idle. (~25 times less, decent saving) (and no noticeable change when playing real audio) > > The SSH transport is not the best place to be doing this sort of > compression! > Aren't there any open-source codec frameworks that could easily be > plugged into the tcp transport? [snip] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20100512/316620b6/attachment.htm>
