aplay -L:
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 0: ALC889A Analog [ALC889A Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 1: ALC889A Digital [ALC889A Digital]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 2: HDMI [HDA ATI HDMI], device 3: ATI HDMI [ATI HDMI]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
cat /proc/asound/pcm:
00-00: ALC889A Analog : ALC889A Analog : playback 1 : capture 1
00-01: ALC889A Digital : ALC889A Digital : playback 1 : capture 1
00-02: ALC889A Analog : ALC889A Analog : capture 2
01-00: USB Audio : USB Audio : capture 1
02-03: ATI HDMI : ATI HDMI : playback 1
I think I have confirmed my theory by putting "card { @func iadd integers [
$CARD -2 ] }"
This subtracted 2 from the input, so a52:2 mapped to card 0.
Any ideas why Pulse requires incrementing %f?
Cheers,
Mike
________________________________
From: pl bossart <bossart.nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
To: General PulseAudio Discussion <pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de>
Sent: Wed, 14 July, 2010 22:30:15
Subject: Re: Cannot have iec958:0 and a52:0 simultaneously?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michael Rans <mcarans at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I have a theory that the $CARD doesn't work for me and may not for others
> because of the way in which the %f in a52:%f is generated.
>
> Would I be right in saying that %f is incremented for each source or sink
> ie. you cannot have both iec958:0 and a52:0?
You seem to have an odd hardware configuration. Can you provide the
output of aplay -l?
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20100714/78c5083e/attachment.htm>
