is there any special reason libpulse and libpulsecommon are separate libraries?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14.01.10 02:50, paul ? (ephraim_owns at hotmail.com) wrote:

> i ask because the circular dependancy they have on each other
> prevents libpulse being built with -no-undefined, which means that
> you could never compile pulse audio on windows afaik

Yes. libpulse is API stable while libpulsecommon is not.

For a longer explanation please read this:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de/msg02333.html

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux