'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 05/01/10 15:51 did gyre and gimble: > ti, 2010-01-05 kello 09:44 +0000, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: >> by "<rolename>" I presume you mean the current stream restore format >> which can include a role-based rule or an application-based rule... > > Yes, that's what I mean. I tried to make that very clear, but > communication is hard :) > >> The above format does not actually allow you to store volumes >> per-application which would kinda suck. > > Why? If <rolename> is exactly the same as the database key format used > today, I fail to see how any functionality could be lost. Well yes, if it is the same it's fine :) I didn't really use my presumption in the second statement - it was the "if it is just a role name" case in actual fact. Sorry for that confusion. :) Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
