'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 18/02/10 00:59 did gyre and gimble: > On Wed, 17.02.10 23:57, Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 17.02.10 23:53, Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) wrote: >> >>>>>>>> So, yes, I actually meant what I did in fb55798a... Now the question >>>>>>>> is why this doesn't work for Pierre. >>>>> >>>>> Additional information: >>>>> - paplay <file.wav> does not start, the start callback isn't called >>>> >>>> Oh, indeed. I can reproduce this here. >>> >>> Actually that was a false alarm. Doesn't actually happen here. The >>> .wav file I tested was simply very long. >> >> Nah, strike that. I actually can repriduce this now, for real. > > OK, fixed now: > > http://git.0pointer.de/?p=pulseaudio.git;a=patch;h=19fa81bf1375032cb1a27c7715a28a52b238d4cb Nice! Should I revert the commit on git master? Or is it harmless? If I do revert, I'll have to fix the passing of the buffer attr to the recording stream as that's something I think you overlooked in the original. Happy to do that just need a nod from you. Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]