On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:36:13AM +1000, Kim Lester wrote: > That's fine by me :-) > Sorry I haven't been around lately to split up my patches etc - > work.... :-) > Trying to keep an eye on PA though. Hmm. I'd appreciate if you could pick up the thread again and follow Lennart's suggestions to clean up the code. Is that possible? It might take awhile until I find time to do it, but I will eventually if nobody else cares. Daniel > On 16/09/2009, at 4:53 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > > >On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >>On Tue, 15.09.09 05:51, Daniel Mack (daniel at caiaq.de) wrote: > >> > >>>I do get another error now, which I will try to sort out later > >>>today. > >>>But maybe anyone has an idea, so I still let you know: > >>> > >>>$ ./pulseaudio > >>>E: semaphore-posix.c: Assertion 'sem_init(&s->sem, 0, value) > >>>== 0' failed at pulsecore/semaphore-posix.c:43, function > >>>pa_semaphore_new(). Aborting. > >>>Abort trap > >> > >>I think this makes an interesting read: > >> > >>https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2008-November/002590.html > > > >Kim Lester already fixed that in his patch. I split it up now to four > >smaller pieces and will send them to list to comment on. > > > >I left all the comments in and cleaned up the coding style as far as I > >could. > > > >And as all the code is from Kim, I used his Signed-off-by line on all > >the patches. Hope that's ok. > > > >Daniel > >_______________________________________________ > >pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > >pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de > >https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de > https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
