On 10/06/2009 08:30 AM, Peter Onion wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > >> Uh. F10. That's quite old. PA is very much in flux, I'd not suggest >> users using old versions like that. >> >> > >> If you ask me, especially developers should live on the bleeding edge, >> > But that doesn't make sense if you are developing real applications. > Real users are seldom on the edge and if your code has to work for them > being a bit behind the curve makes more sense I think. > > Anyway I'm now on F11 . > > >> so if you don't want to go all the way to rawhide (what I'd >> recommend), then at least make sure to run the latest released >> version. >> > I'm just building 0.9.19, but it's failed on the version of sndfile. > > Requested 'sndfile>= 1.0.20' but version of sndfile is 1.0.17 > > If I'm going to have to upgrade lots of other packages I'm afraid it's a > show stopper for my attempt to integrate with pulseaudio properly. > > I've got people lined up to test my applications and I can't expect them > to manually upgrade their machines if the current versions of packages > in their chosen distribution are too old. > > Fair point. For that issues above I just compiled libsndfile from source. I think it was the only dep that had changed from the standard Fedora packages. Cheers. Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd
