On Wed, 13.05.09 20:10, Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) wrote: > gdbm should probably be considered obsolete and this is just another > indication that there is every reason to consider it so. > > There have been plans to abstract the db interfacing in pa as a new > pa_database API. We probably should do that and then switch to tdb as > default backend on Linux. Always happy to take patches. I have now implemented this. PA git can now use either gdbm or tdb as database backend. The latter is the default. When distributions package the upcoming PA 0.9.16 they should replace the gdbm dependency by a tdb dependency, unless they care about the contents of the state database. Usually this however pretty boring information, so I'd just ignore this issue, and just start anew with the tdb database. That's at least what I will be doing Fedora. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
