On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Colin Guthrie<gmane at colin.guthr.ie> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Felipe Contreras at 25/06/09 01:20 did gyre and gimble: >> >> At any given point there's only one *recommended* stable version. > > You've obviously not read the previous mails in this thread. This is not > necessarily true. There might be more than one stable version that is maintained, but when somebody asks which version to use, would you seriously say: you can use either 0.9.14.2, or 0.9.15.1. Wouldn't the latest one be the recommended one? In any case, that's not my main point, my main point is: "If somebody wants to have '$version-stable' then I say it should be in a separate repository." So it doesn't taint the main repo with useless (for developers) branches. -- Felipe Contreras
