On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:58 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > > > Although most of the patches should be wrapped up in .30 now IIRC, so > > you'll need to look at the history. So is that to say that if I use a .30 (say, 2.6.30 final) that I should have all of the patches that Lennart was referring to? > Actually: > > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kernel/F-11/ > > This is probably a better link :) I see: alsa-dont-reset-stream-at-each-prepare-callb.patch alsa-hda-add-debugging.patch 1.1 alsa-hda-dont-reset-BDL-unnecessarily.patch alsa-hda_intel-fix-unexpected-ring-buffer-positio.patch alsa-pcm-always-reset-invalid-position.patch alsa-pcm-fix-delta-calc-at-overlap.patch alsa-pcm-midlevel-add-more-strict-buffer-position.patch alsa-rewrite-hw_ptr-updaters.patch I'm assuming all of the alsa patches would be prefixed by "alsa-". Any idea if any or all of these are in the kernel.org 2.6.30 final? b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20090624/4ea54040/attachment.pgp>
