On Sat, 06.06.09 16:44, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contreras at gmail.com) wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Lennart > Poettering<lennart at poettering.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 06.06.09 15:59, Felipe Contreras (felipe.contreras at gmail.com) wrote: > > > >> >> #if HAVE_STDBOOL_H > >> >> #include <stdbool.h> > >> >> #else > >> >> typedef unsigned char bool > >> >> #endif > >> >> > >> > > >> > This is in public headers. That would mean you have to ensure that the > >> > library and the client side are compiled both with the same config. > >> > Which means practically requiring it to be C99, and thus the if is not > >> > even necessary. > >> > >> Public headers? > > > > What you were suggesting needs to be placed in public > > headers. i.e. the HAVE_STDBOOL_H would need to be defined properly for > > all builds, and the same for the library and the clients build. > > Is pa_bool_t in the public headers? No. And I tried to explain why not. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
