On Mon, 19.01.09 23:01, Aleksander Kamenik (aleksander at krediidiinfo.ee) wrote: > > http://pastebin.com/m76854b7a > > I got something now. That's the only thing I found too, at the end. Hmm, apparently the ALSA API function snd_pcm_hw_params_set_periods_near() fails in all cases. We ask for the exact value of periods and it fails. We tell it to use a higher number of periods than what we ask for and it fails. We then tell it to use a lower number of periods than what we ask for and it fails again. Whatever we do, it doesn't accept setting any periods. We could tape over this: simply ignore that this fails and go on. However this is certainly breakage in ALSA. So please file a bug against ALSA and tell them that on your card snd_pcm_hw_params_set_periods_near() always fails. Then refer them to the pa_alsa_set_hw_params() functions in PA. ALSA folks tend to ignore BTSes. So make sure to post this to the ALSA ML too. One thing you might try before you file that bug is commenting the invocation of snd_pcm_hw_params_set_periods_integer() in that function, recompiling and testing whether that changes the behaviour. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
