On Sat, 27.12.08 22:06, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > >> 'Twas brillig, and H.S. at 27/12/08 00:17 did gyre and gimble: > >>> Sending the streams of an application to a different sink seamlessly is > >>> a heck of a job! > >> What do you mean by this? Personally I find it quite easy with > >> pavucontrol, although it could use some UI love for sure. > > > > Yes, I use that gui too, that is what I had in mind. I didn't know there > > was any other method to accomplish this, though. > > It would be interesting to see what kind of system you would find easier > just now? There are two working groups in Fedora and Ubuntu that are > working on making the UI better so please get involved. Not sure how > much inter-group-communication there is tho'. Mhmm. You say someone at Canonical is working on volume control and stuff? I haven't heard that rumor before. Any links? We at Red Hat have just contributed a new volume control/g-s-p capplet to GNOME upstream, going the usual paths with upstreaming early and stuff. It is already available in Fedora Rawhide. If the Ubuntu guys are doing something similar it would be a good idea to work with upstream (be it PA or GNOME) for that as well. But heck, I haven't heard about any such project of theirs. Hmm, Ubuntu had its problems with working with upstream in the past. I thought they fixed that. If it is true what you say that they have someone working on that than they haven't really improved. I mean, I'd be happy if Ubuntu would really contribute code to the ecosystem instead of their usual hack jobs. But the way to do that is speaking with upstream folks. </rant> Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
