On Mon, 23.02.09 09:07, R?mi Cardona (remi at gentoo.org) wrote: > Le 23/02/2009 03:05, Lennart Poettering a ?crit : >> Not sure about >> Gentoo (they'll probably use -funroll-loops instead because it makes >> things faster or so ;-)) > > Actually, we don't really recommend anything in that area (users build > their own kernel, if it breaks, it's their own damn fault). So having a > list somewhere on the wiki would probably be a good start - for all > users, not just Gentoo users. > > Now, as a side question : what about NO_HZ kernels? I was under the > impression that this was better than setting a 300 or 1000 HZ kernel. > What's your stance on this? In contrast to what the name NO_HZ might suggest it is orthogonal to the HZ setting. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
