Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 22.05.08 14:11, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote: >> I thought the whole point was that by adding async code to ioplug, the >> libflashsupport stuff wasn't needed and flash could just use it's native >> alsa support + alsa's pulse plugin.... or am I missing the point here? > > The destruction dead lock issue is present both in libflashsupport and > the native ALSA backend. It's just that it is almost never triggered > if a hw device is used. Ahhhhhhhhh :) Col
