On Tue, 29.07.08 10:42, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > > I will be making an effort to extend the FAQ based on the most common > > frustrations with 0.9.11. Lennart told us this release may cause more > > problems than it fixes, but even so, we should try to work out as many > > issues as possible, as early as possible, because few who make the > > upgrade will want to go back to 0.9.10 now that a newer version is out > > (because newer is better! Riiiight...?) > > Good plan. > > To be honest, as pulse's profile grows, I think that the PA wiki/site > etc. could do with a bit more of a sexy look to it. I think the Pulse > logo (black background with blue bits) is sweet and that a nice dark > (but usable) theme on Trac would make the whole thing much cooler... (a > bit like the basic look of the compiz-fusion.org site). Not sure if > Lennart is even vaguely interested in that, but I think it may help gain > acceptance... I know it's a trivial thing, but they do say that "the > first bite is with the eye"... ;) Hehe. If you ever saw my homepage or my blog you'll know that i am a big fan of the original html 1.0 look. ;-) The last time I did HTML/CSS or web programming was 10 years ago. And I am happy that I don't have to do this anymore... ;-) That said, I am happy to take patches for a new Trac template, if it looks pretty and clean, doesn't look like something that will feel out-of-date 6 months later, is standards-compliant and a11y friendly. I'd even be willing to update to Trac 0.11, which afair comes with a new template engine? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
