On Wed, 30.07.08 22:15, Stanley Cai (stanley.w.cai at gmail.com) wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 05:01:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 23.07.08 16:27, Stanley Cai (stanley.w.cai at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > The subscription logic is for asynchronous notification. It's purely > > informational, you may not use it to interfere with the normal state > > logic of the core. > the remove/unlink event has no enough information. :) I think the new > event is very close to HOOK_XXX_POST functions. Uh? You claim the unlink hook has "not enough information"? It gets the pointer to the object that is unlinked itself. There cannot be more information than that. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
