On Tue, 04.09.07 00:10, Jan Kasprzak (kas at fi.muni.cz) wrote: > : So in > : the end we might end up with the optional solution of running a > : tiny/dumbed-down pa system instance which sessions connect to. But > : that's way down on my TODO list, and will always stay optional since > : it is detrimental for latency. > > How bad the latency increase may be for adding another "upstream" > daemon? Would it still be usable for the interactive communication > like ekiga? Yes, most likely. But audio production definitely not. (but I guess you wouldn't want to do that on such a multi-seat machine anyway?). Games might be problematic, but should be fine I would guess. Hmm, something's broken with your email quoting. Your '>' looks like a ':' to me. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
