On Thu, 14.06.07 13:07, Damon Harper (dl+pulseaudio-discuss at usrbin.ca) wrote: Hi! > > i've just installed and set up pulseaudio and i am more than impressed > by it - bravo! it is an elegant system and a much-needed one for the > unix world, i think. Thank you. > > i'm a bit of a weird masochist who rolls his own distro and packaging > system for a four-computer network, and i have noticed one problem > with the way pulse works when it is set up as a system-wide daemon - > it stores both temporary and persistent data in the same place > (/var/run/pulse by default). > > for instance, the gconf data and volume-restore.table file *should*, i > presume, be maintained across reboots. on my system, i use /var/run > strictly for temporary data like pid files and sockets and it is wiped > out at each reboot - so the persistent pulse data disappears. > normally persistent data should go under /var/lib or /var/state. Hmm, you're probably right with this interpretation of the FHS. Could you please file a bug, so that I don't forget to fis this? > on the other hand, pulse's pid files and sockets *should* be treated > as temporary data and could be fair game to be wiped out if they > remain when pulse is no longer running. > > i was initially going to set up a system of symlinks to take care of > this, but then i started looking at the pulse source. my general idea > would be to split the PA_SYSTEM_RUNTIME_PATH up into two components, > one for temporary (/var/run/pulse) and one for persistent > (/var/lib/pulse or /var/state/pulse) files. then each component that > needs to store files can choose the appropriate path. > > complications: > > - could affect existing programs? but i don't think so, as most would > reference pid files and sockets which remain in /var/run/pulse. Shouldn't hurt to much, since noone should be accessing these files without going through libpulse. > - how does this interact with the per-user daemon operation? When the daemon is running per user the data is split up cleanly anway. Data that should be save is stored in ~/.pulse and dynamic data is stored in /tmp somewhre. > > - ideally, gconf lock files would go with the temporary data and gconf > data with the permanent, though i don't know enough about gconf to> know if this is easy or even plausible. Humm. I doubt that gconf can do that. > any thoughts? is this feasible / wanted / worth putting some effort > into? are there complications i haven't considered? Makes a lot of sense. Please file a bug and I will eventually fix this. (Though this is actually low-priority for me, I must admit) Thank you for reporting this! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4