> Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: pulseaudio-discuss Digest, Vol 20, Issue 4 (Pierre Ossman) > > > > > Max Kempter wrote: > > Thank you for answer my questuions, but I have some more: > > > > 1. Could you give me some informations about the server hardware > requirements for minimal failure rate and for budget implemention? > > No idea. It all depends on what you want the server to handle. For a system with 20 Server (each per host). For each Host it should be possilbe to send to the others simultaneously. So in the worst case I have 19*20 active channels. When I only want to send voice I have a data rate for one channel about 64kb; for 19*20channels=380 channels; if I send each 3 ms a packet the data rate will go up to 92,1 Mbit/s (include the Ehternet-, IP-,UDP-, RTP- Header and 5 per cent RTCP- Traffic). I only need a estimated value. > > 2. Is it a good a idea to use Audio kernel with RealTime Preemption, if > I want a low latency system? > > Pulse does use any of the realtime syscalls, so I don't think it will > get any performance gain. Is there an other possibility to optimize the kernel for pulse audio? Which is the audio driver with the lowest latency for PA (alsa?)? > > 3.How is it possible to adjust the Default Sample Rate/Type of the > server? With sinks/sources it is not a problem, but...? > > > > Not sure what you're asking here. The settings for clients are > configured in the respective client application. I mean the third row (Default Sample Type) at the PA Manager GUI; first tab (Server Information). -- "Ein Herz f?r Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankesch?n: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht!
