On 3/7/25 13:09, Armin Wolf wrote:
Am 07.03.25 um 01:35 schrieb Kurt Borja:
...
+static const struct hwmon_ops awcc_hwmon_ops = {
+ .is_visible = awcc_hwmon_is_visible,
+ .read = awcc_hwmon_read,
+ .read_string = awcc_hwmon_read_string,
+};
+
+static const struct hwmon_channel_info * const awcc_hwmon_info[] = {
+ HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT,
+ HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT
+ ),
+ HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(fan,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX,
+ HWMON_F_LABEL | HWMON_F_INPUT | HWMON_F_MIN | HWMON_F_MAX
+ ),
+ HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(pwm,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP,
+ HWMON_PWM_AUTO_CHANNELS_TEMP
+ ),
Since the number of fans and temperature sensors is only known at runtime creating awcc_hwmon_info
would make sense.
IIRC Guenter asked another dev to add more CHANNEL_INFO entries instead
of doing that? I might be wrong tho.
I'm fine either way.
If Guenter is fine with your current approach then you can keep it.
In drivers/hwmon, I prefer static descriptions such as the above and using
the is_visible() function to determine if sensor attributes should actually
be created. However, as I have mentioned several times, I do not comment on style
questions like this (or, for that matter, non-standard sysfs attributes) outside
drivers/hwmon, so you can do or request whatever you like.
Guenter
