Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI: platform_profile: fix legacy sysfs with multiple handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is what this patch series essentially does. It makes amd-pmf
accept all choices but only show its own in its own handler and when
it is the only option

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 21:22, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:07 AM Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, making asus-wmi use low-power is indeed the easiest solution, but
> > if I thought it was good enough, I would have done that already as a
> > downstream consumer of the kernel.
> >
> > I just want to be done with this once and for all, so I spent an extra
> > hour today solving this in a cleaner way.
>
> What about adding "quiet" as a "hidden choice" to amd-pmf such that it
> would allow the test_bit(*bit, handler->choices) check in
> _store_class_profile() to pass, but it would not cause this "choice"
> to become visible in the new I/F (or when amd-pmf becomes the only
> platform-profile driver) and it would be aliased to "low-power"
> internally?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux