Am 04.01.25 um 18:18 schrieb Kurt Borja:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 08:59:21PM +0530, Hridesh MG wrote:
Currently the choices for the platform profile are hardcoded. There is
an ACPI bitmap accessible via WMI that specifies the supported profiles,
use this bitmap to dynamically set the choices for the platform profile.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/ecb60ee5-3df7-4d7e-8ebf-8c162b339ade@xxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Hridesh MG <hridesh699@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
index 5370056fb2d03a768162f2f1643ef27dc6deafa8..f6c47deb4c452fc193f22c479c730aecb1e69e44 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/units.h>
#include <linux/unaligned.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
MODULE_AUTHOR("Carlos Corbacho");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Acer Laptop WMI Extras Driver");
@@ -1983,6 +1984,7 @@ acer_predator_v4_platform_profile_set(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
static int acer_platform_profile_setup(struct platform_device *device)
{
if (quirks->predator_v4) {
+ unsigned long supported_profiles;
int err;
platform_profile_handler.name = "acer-wmi";
@@ -1992,16 +1994,30 @@ static int acer_platform_profile_setup(struct platform_device *device)
platform_profile_handler.profile_set =
acer_predator_v4_platform_profile_set;
- set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE,
- platform_profile_handler.choices);
- set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE,
- platform_profile_handler.choices);
- set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED,
- platform_profile_handler.choices);
- set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_QUIET,
- platform_profile_handler.choices);
- set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_LOW_POWER,
- platform_profile_handler.choices);
+ err = WMID_gaming_get_misc_setting(ACER_WMID_MISC_SETTING_SUPPORTED_PROFILES,
+ (u8 *)&supported_profiles);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (test_bit(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_QUIET, &supported_profiles))
+ set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_QUIET,
+ platform_profile_handler.choices);
+
+ if (test_bit(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_BALANCED, &supported_profiles))
+ set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED,
+ platform_profile_handler.choices);
+
+ if (test_bit(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE, &supported_profiles))
+ set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE,
+ platform_profile_handler.choices);
+
+ if (test_bit(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_TURBO, &supported_profiles))
+ set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE,
+ platform_profile_handler.choices);
+
+ if (test_bit(ACER_PREDATOR_V4_THERMAL_PROFILE_ECO, &supported_profiles))
+ set_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_LOW_POWER,
+ platform_profile_handler.choices);
As Armin mentioned, with this approach you may still select unsupported
profiles in acer_thermal_profile_change(). You should either handle that
in this patch or move this patch to the end of the series.
~ Kurt
Correct.
I suggest that you simply reorder the patches so that this patch comes after the platform_profile_cycle() patch.
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
err = platform_profile_register(&platform_profile_handler);