Re: [PATCH v4] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-camera: Use SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER instead of KEY_CAMERA_ACESS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 31.12.24 um 07:13 schrieb Ai Chao:

Use SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER instead of KEY_CAMERA_ACESS_ENABLE and
KEY_CAMERA_ACESS_DISABLE. When the camera toggle switch was hit,
the lenovo-wmi-camera driver would report an event code.

Signed-off-by: Ai Chao <aichao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
change for v4
-Add mutex_unlock and report a switch state of 0 if SW_CAMERA_ON.
change for v3
-Used input_register_device and input_allocate_device.
change for v2
-Only delays the input-device registration and switches to reporting SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER.

  drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-camera.c | 61 +++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-camera.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-camera.c
index 0c0bedaf7407..2a662b3c78f2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-camera.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-camera.c
@@ -26,10 +26,34 @@ enum {
  	SW_CAMERA_ON	= 1,
  };

+static int camera_shutter_input_setup(struct wmi_device *wdev)
+{
+	struct lenovo_wmi_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&wdev->dev);
+	int err;
+
+	priv->idev = input_allocate_device();
+	if (!priv->idev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->idev->name = "Lenovo WMI Camera Button";
+	priv->idev->phys = "wmi/input0";
+	priv->idev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
+	priv->idev->dev.parent = &wdev->dev;
+
+	input_set_capability(priv->idev, EV_SW, SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER);
+
+	err = input_register_device(priv->idev);
+	if (err) {
+		input_free_device(priv->idev);
+		priv->idev = NULL;
+	}
+
+	return err;

Looks good to me, however i just stumbled upon an interesting comment regarding input_event():

	NOTE: input_event() may be safely used right after input device was
allocated with input_allocate_device(), even before it is registered
with input_register_device(), but the event will not reach any of the
input handlers. Such early invocation of input_event() may be used to
'seed' initial state of a switch or initial position of absolute axis,
etc. So maybe it would sense to call input_report_switch() on the input device right before calling
input_device_register(). This would make sure that the initial switch position is correct.

+}
+
  static void lenovo_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
  {
  	struct lenovo_wmi_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&wdev->dev);
-	unsigned int keycode;
  	u8 camera_mode;

  	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
@@ -55,11 +79,16 @@ static void lenovo_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)

  	mutex_lock(&priv->notify_lock);

-	keycode = camera_mode == SW_CAMERA_ON ?
-		   KEY_CAMERA_ACCESS_ENABLE : KEY_CAMERA_ACCESS_DISABLE;
-	input_report_key(priv->idev, keycode, 1);
-	input_sync(priv->idev);
-	input_report_key(priv->idev, keycode, 0);
+	if (!priv->idev)
+		if (camera_shutter_input_setup(wdev)) {
+			mutex_unlock(&priv->notify_lock);
+			return;
+		}

Please add braces to the outer if-statement.

Also if you implement the seeding of the switch position inside camera_shutter_input_setup() when
you can return early if the input device was registered since it would already contain the correct
slider position.

I imagine something like this:

if (!priv->idev) {
	if (camera_shutter_input_setup(wdev, camera_mode))
		dev_warn(&wdev->dev, "Failed to register input device\n");

	mutex_unlock(&priv->notify_lock);
	return;
}

Other than that the patch seems good to me.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

+
+	if (camera_mode == SW_CAMERA_ON)
+		input_report_switch(priv->idev, SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER, 0);
+	else
+		input_report_switch(priv->idev, SW_CAMERA_LENS_COVER, 1);
  	input_sync(priv->idev);

  	mutex_unlock(&priv->notify_lock);
@@ -68,29 +97,12 @@ static void lenovo_wmi_notify(struct wmi_device *wdev, union acpi_object *obj)
  static int lenovo_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void *context)
  {
  	struct lenovo_wmi_priv *priv;
-	int ret;

  	priv = devm_kzalloc(&wdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!priv)
  		return -ENOMEM;

  	dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, priv);
-
-	priv->idev = devm_input_allocate_device(&wdev->dev);
-	if (!priv->idev)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	priv->idev->name = "Lenovo WMI Camera Button";
-	priv->idev->phys = "wmi/input0";
-	priv->idev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
-	priv->idev->dev.parent = &wdev->dev;
-	input_set_capability(priv->idev, EV_KEY, KEY_CAMERA_ACCESS_ENABLE);
-	input_set_capability(priv->idev, EV_KEY, KEY_CAMERA_ACCESS_DISABLE);
-
-	ret = input_register_device(priv->idev);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
  	mutex_init(&priv->notify_lock);

  	return 0;
@@ -100,6 +112,9 @@ static void lenovo_wmi_remove(struct wmi_device *wdev)
  {
  	struct lenovo_wmi_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&wdev->dev);

+	if (priv->idev)
+		input_unregister_device(priv->idev);
+
  	mutex_destroy(&priv->notify_lock);
  }






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux