https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219495 --- Comment #60 from jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to andy.liang from comment #54) > (In reply to jarkko from comment #51) > > (In reply to jarkko from comment #31) > > > OK, I somehow managed to miss it as it had different naming convention > > sorry. > > > > > > Anywhow, I see this: > > > > > > [ 10.693310][ T1] tpm_tis STM0925:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x3, rev-id > > 0) > > > [ 10.848132][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 10.853559][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 59 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:4727 > > > __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > > [ 10.862827][ T1] Modules linked in: > > > [ 10.866671][ T1] CPU: 59 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted > > > 6.12.0-lp155.2.g52785e2-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) > > > 588cd98293a7c9eba9013378d807364c088c9375 > > > [ 10.882741][ T1] Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen12/ProLiant > > > DL320 Gen12, BIOS 1.20 10/28/2024 > > > [ 10.892170][ T1] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > > [ 10.898103][ T1] Code: 24 08 e9 4a fe ff ff e8 34 36 fa ff e9 88 fe > > ff > > > ff 83 fe 0a 0f 86 b3 fd ff ff 80 3d 01 e7 ce 01 00 75 09 c6 05 f8 e6 ce > 01 > > > 01 <0f> 0b 45 31 ff e9 e5 fe ff ff f7 c2 00 00 08 00 75 42 89 d9 80 e1 > > > [ 10.917750][ T1] RSP: 0000:ffffb7cf40077980 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > > [ 10.923777][ T1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000040cc0 RCX: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.931727][ T1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: > > > 0000000000040cc0 > > > [ 10.939678][ T1] RBP: 000000000000000c R08: ffffffffbb6fdc67 R09: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.947626][ T1] R10: ffffb7cf40077ac8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.955560][ T1] R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000cc0 R15: > > > ffff9a5c051cc000 > > > [ 10.963507][ T1] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) > > GS:ffff9a6348780000(0000) > > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.972405][ T1] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 10.978944][ T1] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000184638001 CR4: > > > 0000000000f70ef0 > > > [ 10.986891][ T1] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.994837][ T1] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR7: > > > 0000000000000400 > > > [ 11.002770][ T1] PKRU: 55555554 > > > [ 11.006256][ T1] Call Trace: > > > [ 11.009479][ T1] <TASK> > > > [ 11.012352][ T1] ? __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > > > > > > > > RSI=0x0c, which maps to the parameter 'order' in __alloc_pages_noprof(), > > > which allocates > > > 4096*2**0xc = 16777216 = 16 MiB of memory. This means that memory > consumed > > > by the log is in the range 8 MiB < N <= 16 MiB. > > > > I don't understand why ESI=0x0c while TPM2 table has size 0x800000, which > > maps to the order 0x0b as 4096 * 2**0x0b = 0x800000. > > > > It looks like as if TPM2 table and this transcript are either from > different > > machines or different BIOS versions. I'm not sure how to otherwise explain > > that difference. > > > > For 0x0c, the last line in that TPM2 dump screenshot should start: 00000001 > > not 00008000. > > Sorry about that. The machine I had in November is different from the one in > December. I uploaded a new dmesg with Kernel 6.12.6. Thank you. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307386 OK thanks for responding! I just needed confirmation that I'm not interpreting the log incorrectly :-) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
