Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi-bmof: Make use of .bin_size() callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.12.24 um 01:16 schrieb Armin Wolf:

Am 10.12.24 um 15:47 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, Armin Wolf wrote:

Until now the wmi-bmof driver had to allocate the binary sysfs
attribute dynamically since its size depends on the bmof buffer
returned by the firmware.

Use the new .bin_size() callback to avoid having to do this memory
allocation.

Tested on a Asus Prime B650-Plus.

Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c | 75
+++++++++++++++++----------------
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c
b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c
index df6f0ae6e6c7..3e33da36da8a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi-bmof.c
@@ -20,66 +20,66 @@

  #define WMI_BMOF_GUID "05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910"

-struct bmof_priv {
-    union acpi_object *bmofdata;
-    struct bin_attribute bmof_bin_attr;
-};
-
-static ssize_t read_bmof(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr,
+static ssize_t bmof_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
const struct bin_attribute *attr,
               char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
  {
-    struct bmof_priv *priv = container_of(attr, struct bmof_priv,
bmof_bin_attr);
+    struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+    union acpi_object *obj = dev_get_drvdata(dev);

-    return memory_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &off,
priv->bmofdata->buffer.pointer,
-                       priv->bmofdata->buffer.length);
+    return memory_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &off,
obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
  }

-static int wmi_bmof_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void
*context)
+static const BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_RO(bmof, 0);
+
+static const struct bin_attribute * const bmof_attrs[] = {
+    &bin_attr_bmof,
+    NULL
+};
+
+static size_t bmof_bin_size(struct kobject *kobj, const struct
bin_attribute *attr, int n)
  {
-    struct bmof_priv *priv;
-    int ret;
+    struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+    union acpi_object *obj = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+    return obj->buffer.length;
+}

-    priv = devm_kzalloc(&wdev->dev, sizeof(struct bmof_priv),
GFP_KERNEL);
-    if (!priv)
-        return -ENOMEM;
+static const struct attribute_group bmof_group = {
+    .bin_size = bmof_bin_size,
+    .bin_attrs_new = bmof_attrs,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *bmof_groups[] = {
+    &bmof_group,
+    NULL
+};

-    dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, priv);
+static int wmi_bmof_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev, const void
*context)
+{
+    union acpi_object *obj;

-    priv->bmofdata = wmidev_block_query(wdev, 0);
-    if (!priv->bmofdata) {
+    obj = wmidev_block_query(wdev, 0);
+    if (!obj) {
          dev_err(&wdev->dev, "failed to read Binary MOF\n");
          return -EIO;
      }

-    if (priv->bmofdata->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+    if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
          dev_err(&wdev->dev, "Binary MOF is not a buffer\n");
-        ret = -EIO;
-        goto err_free;
+        kfree(obj);
+        return -EIO;
      }

-    sysfs_bin_attr_init(&priv->bmof_bin_attr);
-    priv->bmof_bin_attr.attr.name = "bmof";
-    priv->bmof_bin_attr.attr.mode = 0400;
-    priv->bmof_bin_attr.read = read_bmof;
-    priv->bmof_bin_attr.size = priv->bmofdata->buffer.length;
-
-    ret = device_create_bin_file(&wdev->dev, &priv->bmof_bin_attr);
-    if (ret)
-        goto err_free;
+    dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, obj);

      return 0;
-
- err_free:
-    kfree(priv->bmofdata);
-    return ret;
  }

  static void wmi_bmof_remove(struct wmi_device *wdev)
  {
-    struct bmof_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&wdev->dev);
+    union acpi_object *obj = dev_get_drvdata(&wdev->dev);

-    device_remove_bin_file(&wdev->dev, &priv->bmof_bin_attr);
-    kfree(priv->bmofdata);
+    kfree(obj);
  }

  static const struct wmi_device_id wmi_bmof_id_table[] = {
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static const struct wmi_device_id
wmi_bmof_id_table[] = {
  static struct wmi_driver wmi_bmof_driver = {
      .driver = {
          .name = "wmi-bmof",
+        .dev_groups = bmof_groups,
      },
      .probe = wmi_bmof_probe,
      .remove = wmi_bmof_remove,
So do I understand right that this meant to supercede the patch from
Thomas?

Yes, i totally overlooked this patch, sorry. I will ask him to drop
his patch.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

Thomas is fine with dropping his patch, so i think we can move forward.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux